|
Tender evaluation is always carried out in a comprehensive,
equitable, auditable and transparent manner. To ensure fairness the
evaluation criteria and method will be clearly defined before
tender documents are issued.
The council must be sure that in selecting a supplier/contractor
it is getting value for money and the services will be delivered
effectively. Evaluation is therefore based on two key criteria -
how the tender proposes to deliver the contract (quality) and the
cost of the contract (price). The council are looking for the best
balance of quality and price, not just the lowest price. In most
cases additional criteria will also be used in evaluating
tenderer's.
Contracts are awarded to the provider who is considered to offer
value for money, having regard to price, quality and best value -
sometimes referred to as "most economically advantageous tender"
(MEAT), and to be best able to meet the council's specification.
Evaluation of the most economically advantageous tender can
incorporate a number of factors including:
- Financial viability of the tender
- Quality issues
- Technical merit
- After sales service
- Delivery date
- Technical back-up
- Experience
- Competence
- Policy issues such as equalities & sustainability
- The criteria to be used will be listed in the tender documents,
in order of importance. The weightings of the criteria may also be
given.
- Within the limits of commercial confidentiality, we will always
endeavour to offer unsuccessful tenderer's feedback to find out why
their bid was unsuccessful.
We monitors our performance as part of its duty under Best
Value, and this includes monitoring services provided on our
behalf. You will be expected to provide the service in accordance
with requirements set out in the contract documentation and your
proposals to carry out the contract.
|